This article continues the CM Baseline series by discussing ‘Change Dependencies,’ the third component. It outlines the types of dependencies—logical, preferential, and resource—that affect the sequence of implementing changes. Understanding these dependencies aids project management by providing a clear roadmap for navigating the implementation phase and optimizing change processes.
The article discusses managing changes in the CM Baseline series using analogies related to flights. It introduces the Impact Matrix as a critical component that captures the intentions behind changes, detailing affected objects and relationships. The post emphasizes the significance of effective visualization and analysis for collaborative decision-making in change management.
The post discusses the challenges of managing changes and dependencies in configurations, introducing the CM2 Baseline as a solution. This baseline integrates communication through a Business Object Graph, highlighting the importance of connections for impact analysis. It emphasizes real-time data sharing while maintaining the integrity of expert domain tools.
The post discusses the challenges of managing complex product development without effective systems, comparing it to a lack of air traffic control leading to crashes. It introduces CM2’s Baseline solution for managing planned changes and their impacts but notes integration difficulties across different systems. Effective change management and dependency tracking are essential for timely product development.
On September 9, 2021, I conducted a full day of lectures on Configuration Management at Avans University, attracting over 30 students. The day included the creation of Word Clouds to gauge insights, discussions on key topics, and engaging exercises with LEGO bricks. The initiative has reached over 100 students, promoting awareness in Configuration Management.
The post discusses themes from the IpX ConX19 keynote on the importance of effective impact analysis in decision-making within organizations. It contrasts communication dynamics in small versus large companies, highlighting how siloed structures can hinder collaboration and lead to costly mistakes. The piece emphasizes the need for standardized communication tools to improve impact analysis quality.
On September 10, 2020, lectures on Configuration Management at Avans University highlighted the “Butterfly Effect,” where minor changes can lead to significant impacts in product development. The presenter emphasizes awareness and collaboration in managing changes effectively, urging professionals to enhance exposure to Configuration Management in educational settings for broader positive outcomes.
The COVID-19 Impact on Configuration Management Survey garnered 35 responses, revealing that about a third of organizations experienced disruptions in their Configuration Management processes. Most organizations were not paper-based and relied on automation. Change Management and Verification & Audit were the most affected areas, while some reported positive outcomes, particularly with enhanced electronic processes.
Joe Barkai’s article “How Many ECOs are Preventable?” discusses the negative impact of Engineering Change Orders (ECOs) on product development, emphasizing that they are often corrective actions stemming from poor requirements, design, or manufacturing. Companies should focus on minimizing ECOs while promoting positive changes that generate value and improve efficiency.
The article discusses CM2 as a comprehensive enterprise configuration management standard, contrasting it with other management frameworks like PLM. The author responds to Jos Voskuil’s views on impact analysis and highlights CM2’s broader scope and training requirements. It emphasizes the relevance of CM in various industries, advocating for its adoption and community engagement.